I understand and agree with putting graphics behind cuts to save space/bandwidth BUT I disagree with your definition because the image above did not require ANY scrolling on my part (and I looked at it in both Firefox and Opera just in case).
Sounds like you have your graphics settings set unusually large or with extremely large fonts.
You can't really blame anyone but yourself for that. You aren't seeing things in a layout that the web is designed for. You're displaying it in a much smaller area than is 'normal'.
How very rude and impolite of you. There's no need for such annoying behavior here in this conversation. You were making demands on what someone else posted in their own journal which were not a problem for anyone else reading the journal. That does not give you any right or privilage to act like a teenage malcontent.
Maybe you're having a bad day at work or something, but this is not the outlet for you to transfer your anger over it on others.
I was having a perfectly fine day until you insulted me. The web was not designed for any particular layout and I take offense at your statement that I am somehow not normal because my desktop does not conform to your whim.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: Sorry,
Date: 2005-02-18 07:25 pm (UTC)Re: Sorry,
Date: 2005-02-18 08:32 pm (UTC)Sounds like you have your graphics settings set unusually large or with extremely large fonts.
Re: Sorry,
Date: 2005-02-18 08:51 pm (UTC)Re: Sorry,
Date: 2005-02-18 08:58 pm (UTC)Re: Sorry,
Date: 2005-02-18 09:01 pm (UTC)Re: Sorry,
Date: 2005-02-18 09:23 pm (UTC)Maybe you're having a bad day at work or something, but this is not the outlet for you to transfer your anger over it on others.
Re: Sorry,
Date: 2005-02-18 09:32 pm (UTC)Tom: sorry about that. I'll end it here.